Summary diagram
All four levels in one picture, scored and color-banded. Hover any element for the best practice and its standard deviation; click to open what sits beneath it.
NeuraTool
Results are never one chart. Executives want the single score, the improvement team wants the weakest practice, and the person running the meeting wants to know whether the room agrees. NeuraTool answers all three from the same compiled data, and every view can be sliced by division, role, region or any group you define.
A question scores a best practice, best practices score a category, categories score a section, and the sections give the organization one number it can be measured against next year. Nothing is averaged by hand, and every score can be opened until you reach the individual answers underneath it.
The broad halves of the model — what enables performance, and what implements it.
The disciplines inside each section: process management, measurement, planning.
The practices an organization either has in place or does not. This is where plans get written.
What each respondent was actually asked, and what each of them answered.
All four levels in one picture, scored and color-banded. Hover any element for the best practice and its standard deviation; click to open what sits beneath it.
One score across many groups, from the whole survey down to a single question — the view that finds pockets of excellence and the sites that need help.
A set of scores for several groups at once, overlaid, for comparing entities across selected performance areas.
Every best practice placed by score against its importance, so investment goes where the potential for improvement is largest.
Not how high the score is — how much the organization agrees on it. A high score nobody agrees on is a different problem from a low one everybody sees.
Direct comparison of groups on scales derived from key success factors, with clustered questions as the axes.
Every scored element for a group, sortable by any column. Strengths one click, weaknesses the next.
Question by question, with the response distribution and the answer text behind each score.
What people wrote in their own words, grouped by where in the survey they wrote it.
A tree of every multiple-choice question, broken down choice by choice for any group.
How the answers spread, rather than where they average — the detail a mean hides.
The specialized readings built into specific assessment models, carried over intact.
Where exposure concentrates, for the assessments built around risk rather than maturity.
Combine and filter demographics into a saved group — a division minus one site, every manager across three regions — and every chart honors it.
Any two groups compared in one chart, so the difference is the thing on screen.
Who has responded and how far they got while the survey is open, and any table out to a formatted workbook.
NeuraTool has been rebuilt from the ground up on the database it has always used. Every survey ever run is still there, scored exactly as it was. It runs in a browser with nothing to install, and views that used to take twenty seconds now return in under one.